Student Debt Slavery: Bankrolling Financiers on the Backs of the Young

Higher education has been financialized, transformed from a public service into a lucrative cash cow for private investors.

The advantages of slavery by debt over “chattel” slavery – ownership of humans as a property right – were set out in an infamous document called the Hazard Circular, reportedly circulated by British banking interests among their American banking counterparts during the American Civil War. It read in part:

Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and chattel slavery destroyed. This, I and my European friends are glad of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care of the laborers, while the European plan, led by England, is that capital shall control labor by controlling wages.

Slaves had to be housed, fed and cared for. “Free” men housed and fed themselves. For the more dangerous jobs, such as mining, Irish immigrants were used rather than black slaves, because the Irish were expendable. Free men could be kept enslaved by debt, by paying them wages that were insufficient to meet their costs of living. On how to control wages, the Hazard Circular went on:

This can be done by controlling the money. The great debt that capitalists will see to it is made out of the war, must be used as a means to control the volume of money. . . . It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that.

The government, too, had to be enslaved by debt. It could not be allowed to simply issue the money it needed to meet its budget, as Lincoln’s government did with its greenbacks (government-issued US Notes). The greenback program was terminated after the war, forcing the government to borrow from banks – banks that created the money themselves, just as the government had been doing. Only about 10% of the “banknotes” then issued by banks were actually backed by gold. The rest were effectively counterfeit. The difference between government-created and bank-created money was that the government issued it and spent it on the federal budget, creating demand and stimulating the economy. Banks issued money and lent it, at interest. More had to be paid back than was lent, keeping the supply of money tight and keeping both workers and the government in debt.

Student Debt Peonage

Slavery by debt has continued to this day, and it is particularly evident in the plight of students. Graduates leave college with a diploma and a massive debt on their backs, averaging over $37,000 in 2016. The government’s student loan portfolio now totals $1.37 trillion, making it the second highest consumer debt category behind only mortgage debt. Student debt has risen nearly 164% in 25 years, while median wages have increased only 1.6%.

Unlike mortgage debt, student debt must be paid. Students cannot just turn in their diplomas and walk away, as homeowners can with their keys. Wages, unemployment benefits, tax refunds and even Social Security checks can be tapped to ensure repayment. In 1998, Sallie Mae (the Student Loan Marketing Association) was privatized, and Congress removed the dischargeabilility of federal student debt in bankruptcy, absent exceptional circumstances. In 2005, this lender protection was extended to private student loans. Because lenders know that their debts cannot be discharged, they have little incentive to consider a student borrower’s ability to repay. Most students are granted a nearly unlimited line of credit. This, in turn, has led to skyrocketing tuition rates, since universities know the money is available to pay them; and that has created the need for students to borrow even more.

Students take on a huge debt load with the promise that their degrees will be the doorway to jobs allowing them to pay it back, but for many the jobs are not there or not sufficient to meet expenses. Today nearly one-third of borrowers have made no headway in paying down their loans five years after leaving school, although many of these borrowers are not in default. They make payments month after month consisting only of interest, while they continue to owe the full amount they borrowed. This can mean a lifetime of tribute to the lenders, while the loan is never paid off, a classic form of debt peonage to the lender class.

All of this has made student debt a very attractive asset for investors. Student loans are pooled and repackaged into student loan asset-backed securities (SLABS), similar to the notorious mortgage-backed securities through which home buyers were caught in a massive debt trap in 2008-09. The nameless, faceless investors want their payments when due, and the strict terms of the loans make it more profitable to force a default than to negotiate terms the borrower can actually meet. About 80% of SLABS are backed by government-insured loans, guaranteeing that the investors will get paid even if the borrower defaults. The onerous federal bankruptcy laws also make SLABS particularly safe and desirable investments.

But as economist Michael Hudson observes, debts that can’t be paid won’t be paid. As of  September 2017, the default rate on student debt was over 11% at public colleges and was 15.5% at private for-profit  colleges. Defaulted borrowers risk damaging their credit and their ability to borrow for such things as homes, cars, and furniture, reducing consumer demand and constraining economic growth. Massive defaults could also squeeze the federal budget, since taxpayers ultimately cover any unpaid loans.

Investing in Human Capital: Student Debt and the G.I. Bill

It hasn’t always been this way. Until the 1970s, tuition at many state colleges and universities was free or nearly free. Education was considered an obligation of the public sector, and costs were kept low.

After World War II, the federal government invested heavily in educating the 15.7 million returning American veterans. The goal of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, or G.I. Bill, was to facilitate their reintegration into civilian life. By far its most popular benefits were financial assistance for education and housing. Over half of G.I.s took advantage of this educational provision, with 2.2 million attending college and 5.6 million opting for vocational training. At that time there were serious shortages in student housing and faculty, but the nation’s colleges and universities expanded to meet the increased demand.

The G.I. Bill’s educational benefits helped train legions of professionals, spurring postwar economic growth. It funded the education of 450,000 engineers, 240,000 accountants, 238,000 teachers, 91,000 scientists, 67,000 doctors and 22,000 dentists, 14 future Nobel laureates, two dozen Pulitzer Prize winners, three Supreme Court justices, and three presidents of the United States. Loans enabled by the bill also boosted the housing market, raising home ownership from 44% before the war to 60% by 1956. Rather than costing the government, the G.I. Bill turned out to be one of the best investments it ever made. The legislation is estimated to have cost $50 billion in today’s dollars and to have returned $350 billion to the economy, a nearly sevenfold return.

That educational feat could be repeated today. The government could fund a public education program as Lincoln did, by simply issuing the money or having the central bank issue it as a form of “quantitative easing for people.” Infrastructure funded with government-issued US Notes in the 1860s included not only the transcontinental railroad but the system of free colleges and universities established through federal land grants.

The exponential rise in college costs occurred only after the government got into the student loan business in a big way. The Higher Education Act of 1965 was part of President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society agenda, intended “to strengthen the educational resources of our colleges and universities and to provide financial assistance for students in postsecondary and higher education.” The Act increased federal money given to universities, created scholarships, gave low-interest loans for students, established a National Teachers Corps, and included a PLUS loan program that allowed parents of undergraduate and graduate students to borrow up to the full cost of attending college. Unfortunately, the well-intended Act had the perverse effect of driving up tuition costs. The availability of federally guaranteed loans allowed colleges and universities to raise their prices to whatever the market would bear. By the mid-1970s, tuition was rising much faster than inflation. But costs remain manageable until the late 1990s, when the federal student loan business was turned over to private banks and investors with aggressive collection practices, converting federally-guaranteed student loans from a public service into a private investor boondoggle.

Meanwhile, in many countries in Europe university tuition is still free, including Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Norway, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden and Turkey. But providing an affordable education for the next generation is evidently not a priority with our government. Only 3 percent of the federal budget is spent on education – not just for college loans but for school programs of all sorts, from kindergarten through graduate school. Compare that to the outlay for military spending, including the Veterans Affairs and other defense-related departments, which consumes over half the federal budget and is an obvious place to cut. But there are no signs that our government is moving in that direction.

What then can be done to relieve the student debt burden? Stay tuned for Part 2.

_____________

Originally published on Truthdig.org.

Ellen Brown is an attorney, chairman of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including Web of Debt and The Public Bank Solution. A thirteenth book titled The Coming Revolution in Banking is due out soon. Her 300+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.
 

New Jersey and Several US Cities Moving to Establish Public Banks

34 Responses

  1. […] via Student Debt Slavery: Bankrolling Financiers on the Backs of the Young — WEB OF DEBT BLOG […]

  2. maybe it should be “Hazzard” rather than “Hazard”?

  3. Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
    Excellent analysis. Look forward to Part Two.

  4. The student loan problem is like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
    Any Monetary sovereign government can make all education expenses free! It simply has to mark up the insurer accounts and hey presto, no debts. It is quite inimical to expand or forward charge students who are part of the infrastructure the economy needs to be able to grow and replace agieng production.

  5. I entered a highly rated state university in 1959 from out of state. My first semester invoice including dorm, food plan, all fees, tuition etc. was $354. I was able to work my way through to a degree on minimum wage jobs when the wage was $1.25/hr. Something is seriously wrong in this country.

  6. Thank you, Ellen!

    We’ll post after our holiday hiatus….

    I hope you’re doing well!

    Best, Lauren

    >

  7. […] Ellen Brown Web of Debt […]

  8. Everyone who has a dedication to the long term public interest has to begin paying attention to the critique that Ellen Brown has provided.

    Ignoring the traditions of public credit creation is not an acceptable position for those in decision making political roles. The public has to demand better.

  9. Reblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
    The advantages of slavery by debt over “chattel” slavery – ownership of humans as a property right – were set out in an infamous document called the Hazard Circular, reportedly circulated by British banking interests among their American banking counterparts during the American Civil War.

  10. […] There’s more. I recommend you check it out. […]

  11. Ellen for President

    Silver stocks should go to da moon Someday. Possibly Jan 11

    Sent from my I phone

  12. There is not much on can say to improve on such top shelf piece again.

    Further I don’t like to go negative however when I see the nation under attack it’s only our duty to challenge athority and their owner masters. Thank You again Ellen.

    Below is how I tried to spread the word to a few friends I thought might not mind a rare rant!

    From Tom!

    The Constitution says public money not private Federal Reserve.

    I always say from whence it came and here we see the line back clearly quite a long way!!!

    Very interesting read.

    They the OWNERS so afraid of the strength of this historically great country. Now however it seems we are determined to let China show us how our own game is played. While a bunch of narrow minded children of great Americans, left with trust funds turn this country from an equitable pyramid of strength to a top well into its wobble.

    Olins, Carnegie heirs, Kocks, Mercersk, Waltons, and a few others. A really small number of elitist all on the same page.

    UNAMERICAN

    Happy New Year, All the Best, and Let’s Pay Attention ThisYear,

  13. I ment the Mercer crew above. Feel free to correct Ellen

  14. Excellent piece; “The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.” – Lord Acton

  15. Reblogged this on UZA – a people's court of conscience.

  16. […] by Ellen Brown […]

  17. […] Source Web of Debt Dec […]

  18. […] Ellen Brown Writer, Dandelion Salad The Web of Debt Blog December 28, […]

  19. It is even worse than you say. If you had run up a student debt of $27,000 and credit card debt totaling $3,500, you could start making payments as soon as you started working for the Disney IT dept or for some other conglomerate. But one day the whole IT staff is called into a meeting where they are told they will be replaced by H1-B visa holders. You might be able to get a job at half the wage, but you will be in such a financial hole that you might never climb out.

    A similar scam was pulled during the mortgage crisis. Bankers knew when they made loans that the decision to close 70,000 manufacturing facilities and send millions of jobs overseas meant that the borrowers would lose their homes. But the FED will buy any fraudulent and worthless loan at their Discount Window so who cares? We care but Bankers don’t and they own the politicians.

    • Great comment.

  20. […] Article Here […]

  21. […] – Schiff Gold 12/29  China may be a bigger worry for 2018 – CNBC 12/29  Student debt slavery: bankrolling financiers on the backs of the young – Web of Debt 12/29  Japanese stocks head for best year since 2013 with U.S. help – […]

  22. […] The Web Of Debt Blog — The advantages of slavery by debt over “chattel” slavery – ownership of humans as a property right – were set out in an infamous document called the Hazard Circular, reportedly circulated by British banking interests among their American banking counterparts during the American Civil War. It read in part: […]

  23. While I agree with the basic premise, a few counter points are in order:

    “Unlike mortgage debt, student debt must be paid. Students cannot just turn in their diplomas and walk away, as homeowners can with their keys. “

    True, but there is no effective way to force a student to “unlearn” their education. And even if the diploma was turned in, the transcripts would still exist. How many employers actually bother to check up on a student’s diploma anyway?

    Students are hardly forced to take on a pile of debt, choosing a state school, getting first two years at a JC, working while learning, living at parent’s home, etc. are ways to limit one’s exposure.

    There are ways to get loan debt (federal only)discharged, teaching at select K-12 schools being one.

    Simply writing off student debt isn’t going to solve the problem, and will create new ones.

  24. America is a communist slave dictatorship. Going to college is like buying losing lottery tickets.

    • Communist? Under socialism and communism the means of production are owned by the workers. Very little of that in America. It is a dictatorship by the wealthy–an oligarchy. https://represent.us/action/theproblem-3/

  25. […] The Web Of Debt Blog —The advantages of slavery by debt over “chattel” slavery – ownership of humans as a property right – were set out in an infamous document called the Hazard Circular, reportedly circulated by British banking interests among their American banking counterparts during the American Civil War. It read in part: […]

  26. […] https://ellenbrown.com/2017/12/26/student-debt-slavery-bankrolling-financiers-on-the-backs-of-the-yo… […]

  27. […] Student Debt Slavery: Bankrolling Financiers on the Backs of the Young […]

  28. Ellen, Please come speak about Public Banks at our April Debtors Assembly in Portland, OR. Can get you on alaska air and have place for you to stay. David Delk also speaking.

    • Thanks Sandra, sounds interesting. Do you want to write to my email address? Ellenhbrown@gmail.com.

  29. […] ⇧   Student Debt Slavery: Bankrolling Financiers on the Backs of the Young | WEB OF DEBT BLOG […]

  30. […] https://ellenbrown.com/2017/12/26/student-debt-slavery-bankrolling-financiers-on-the-backs-of-the-yo… […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: