Filed under: In the News | 2 Comments »
Systemic failure
Pennsylvania Student Loans Halted on Auction Failures
By Adam L. Cataldo
Feb. 27 (Bloomberg) — The Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, the second-largest seller of auction-rate debt for the past seven years, will stop making student loans next month after paying $24 million in extra interest.
The agency services and buys existing obligations and makes about $500 million in new loans annually, chief financial officer Tim Guenther said. Officials, who made 140,000 student loans in the 12 months through June 30, said they will halt making new ones on March 7.
Filed under: In the News | Leave a comment »
Richard Cook’s tale of the national dividend is explored in this look into the future.
Finally: Economic Sanity Returns to America
by Richard C. Cook / February 28th, 2008
It started with the crash and depression of 2008-2009. Consumers had finally lost the ability to float global business with their credit cards and home equity loans.Finally even the politicians had to face the facts. Ever since the 1980s, when the economy was handed over for plundering to the banks and the Wall Street plutocrats, ordinary people had struggled just to survive.
Filed under: Brainstorming | Leave a comment »
Looking into the Abyss — Feb 24, 2008
The Three Trillion Dollar War
Feb 23, 2008
The endless borrowing at endless interest for a seemingly endless number of years works as long as there is an endless amount of available credit; but can it continue? Here is an estimate by Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Blimes of the London Times as to the real extent of the financial cost.
From the unhealthy brew of emergency funding, multiple sets of books, and chronic underestimates of the resources required to prosecute the war, we have attempted to identify how much we have been spending – and how much we will, in the end, likely have to spend. The figure we arrive at is more than $3 trillion. Our calculations are based on conservative assumptions. They are conceptually simple, even if occasionally technically complicated. A $3 trillion figure for the total cost strikes us as judicious, and probably errs on the low side….
The price in treasure has, in a sense, been financed entirely by borrowing. Taxes have not been raised to pay for it – in fact, taxes on the rich have actually fallen. Deficit spending gives the illusion that the laws of economics can be repealed, that we can have both guns and butter. But of course the laws are not repealed. The costs of the war are real even if they have been deferred, possibly to another generation.
*********************************************
German State-Owned Banks on Verge of Collapse
Feb 20, 2008
Der Spiegal Online details how Germany is being sucked into the imploding derivatives bubble, as the Ponzi implodes internationally. Note how the position and credit situation of this bank was made desperate at the insistence of authorities in Brussels (EU), setting them on a high risk course. There should be some interesting back story there.
The German government has had to bail out state-owned banks with taxpayers’ money after their managements recklessly gambled away billions on subprime investments. But if a state-owned bank were to go under, the consequences could be disastrous for the whole economy . . . . Hard up for funds, many of the public-sector banks began speculating with high-risk securities. According to a former bank executive, many “literally stocked up on these investments” shortly before the cut-off date. Others even continued to do so after the cut-off date. Lacking a functioning business model, they turned to what was essentially gambling — and lost.
***********************************************
U.S. to turn up heat on tax protesters
Feb. 20, 2008
The current crisis creates a tax hungry IRS, and it looks like it is not the high rollers who will get the heat so much as the tax protestor or rather Tax Denier participants. To understand the position of many of the targeted non-filers more fully than this article explains, look up online Aaron Russo’s film of last year, “America: From Freedom to Fascism”; there is a great airing of the situation there.
Although someone like Snipes is high profile and wealthy, the target here is a lot of rather median-to-small earners. That begs the question of whether the IRS and Justice Department are trying to head off an exodus by the suddenly-poor from the tax collecting system, just as many are now walking away from their “upside down” mortgages. Are they expecting to have to head off a growing sense of rebellion in our financial system, as the air goes out of the Ponzi scheme?
The Justice Department, on the heels of a split verdict in its tax evasion prosecution of actor Wesley Snipes, is planning a crackdown on the so-called tax protester movement . . . . Officials say the movement costs government many millions.
By Robert Schmidt, Bloomberg News
http://tinyurl.com/2lruhq
**************************
Wall Street Bank Run
Thursday, February 21, 2008
This commentary, by David Ignatius of the Washington Post, describes the banks’ run upon themselves, as credit contracts and contracts; and further points out just WHO is bringing money back into the country to keep things pumped up, and to whom America will owe an enormous debt.
It doesn’t look like an old-fashioned bank run because it involves the biggest financial institutions, trading paper assets so complicated that even top executives don’t fully understand the transactions. But that’s what it is — a spreading fear among financial institutions that their brethren can’t be trusted to honor their obligations.
Frightened financiers are pulling back from credit markets — going on strike, if you will — to escape the unraveling daisy chain of securitized assets and promissory notes that binds the global financial system. As each financier tries to protect against the next one’s mistakes, the whole system begins to sag. That’s what we’re seeing now, as credit market troubles spread from bundles of subprime residential mortgages to bundles of other kinds of debt — from student loans to retailers’ receivables to municipal bonds.
The hubris in this system was Wall Street’s confidence that it could value paper securities that had been sliced and diced so many times that they no longer had solid connections to their underlying assets. The nation’s leading financier, Warren Buffett, had warned years before that “derivatives,” whose value was balanced loosely on the real assets underneath, were the equivalent of “financial weapons of mass destruction.” But in the rush for profits, nobody listened.
And who is bailing out America’s biggest banks and financial institutions from the consequences of their folly? It’s the sovereign wealth funds, owned by such nations as China and the Persian Gulf oil producers. The new titans are coming to the rescue, if that’s the right word for their mortgage on America’s future.
http://tinyurl.com/2u37sl
Filed under: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
More bad news – and how to fix it
AMERICA’S ECONOMY RISKS THE MOTHER OF ALL MELT DOWNS…The Financial Times delivers the lowdown on the actual potential magnitude of America’s financial decline, based upon the formerly controversial (now operational) 12 step path to recession and melt down, as forecast in 2006 by Nouriel Roubini of the New York School of Business.“Recently, Professor Roubini’s scenarios have been dire enough to make the flesh creep. But his thinking deserves to be taken seriously. He first predicted a US recession in July 2006*. At that time, his view was extremely controversial. It is so no longer. Now he states that there is “a rising probability of a ‘catastrophic’ financial and economic outcome”**. The characteristics of this scenario are, he argues: “A vicious circle where a deep recession makes the financial losses more severe and where, in turn, large and growing financial losses and a financial meltdown make the recession even more severe.”********TREATING DEATH AS A COMMODITY…Not sure exactly how this works, but it shows how speculators will take virtually anything and try to convert it into a quick investment profit. It is a tendency that has come to haunt us in the subprime world.********THE SUBPRIME MESS GRAPHICALLY (AND COMICALLY) EXPLAINED….This PowerPoint link will save you reading whole chapters of “Web of Debt” . . . and give you some much needed laughs.********U.S. CREDIT MARKETS COLLAPSING…From Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D., in Money and Markets newsletter —“The U.S. credit markets, the giant growth engine that powers the American economy, are collapsing … with few credit sectors spared from damage, few investors escaping losses, and little hope of federal action that’s quick or strong enough to make a major difference…….. Without the triple-A rating, their whole reason to exist falls by the wayside: They cannot enhance the credit of bond issuers. They cannot do more business. They may as well close their doors and go home.”********U.S. COMPTROLLER GENERAL RESIGNSOne of the last few officials working hard to get out the truth about budgets and astronomical looming entitlements has walked away from it all. David M. Walker of the Government Accountability Office resigned Feb. 15th.********BERNANKE: “YOU’RE ALL DEAD DUCKS”… He did not really say that, but Mike Whitney’s characterization of Bernanke’s recent testimony says he might as well have:“Even veteran Fed-watchers were caught off-guard by Chairman Bernanke’s performance before the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday. Bernanke was expected to make routine comments on the state of the economy but, instead, delivered a 45 minute sermon detailing the afflictions of the foundering financial system. The Senate chamber was stone-silent throughout. The gravity of the situation is finally beginning to sink in.”********PAULSON’S WILD RIDE ON THE HINDENBURG: “THE WORST HAS JUST BEGUN”Mike Whitney again, watching the spin unravel into more of a confessional, as the Treasury Secretary unveils “Project Lifeline”, a rather thin safety net to buy the foreclosed some time, and revealingly answers some hard questions from reporters. For example:Reporter: “Sir, is the worst over, yet? Will 2008 have fewer foreclosures?”Secretary of the Treasury Paulson: “In terms of sub-prime and the resets, the worst isn’t over. The worst is just beginning…. There’s close to 2 million adjustable rate mortgages where the rate is going to be reset over the next couple of years.”********Fortunately, there is another alternative. It’s all in the revised, updated “Web of Debt” — available now! http://tinyurl.com/yqbjth
Filed under: In the News | 1 Comment »
How to Start Your Own Bank
How to start your own bank:
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/schoon/2007/0514.html
http://money.howstuffworks.com/bank5.htm
Idea: we get 6 investors with $100,000 each to become the directors. Their $600,000 is the 10% needed to get started; we raise the other 90% by issuing stock. That gives us capital of $6 million, enough to charter a bank. Then we’re allowed to create and lend . . . $200 million! (See first article above.) Today you only need 3% reserves if you’re a small bank. The BIS (Bank for International Settlements) capital requirements are a bit higher — 8% — but even at 8%, our $6 million lets us lend $50 million. We lend interest-free to various worthy causes that will generate a profit if they don’t have the burden of interest, such as alternative energy projects, low-cost housing, Permaculture farming projects and the like. Rather than charging interest, we take a modest share of the profits, on the model of Islamic banking or investment banking; but our real purpose is to set up a working model of what community-oriented banking could be. We use the principles developed over 300 years by the private banking system and turn them to public ends.
Filed under: Brainstorming | 14 Comments »
Northern Rock Nationalized
In England, the government does not bail out bankrupt banks without some quid pro quo; it takes their stock . . .
LONDON – Britain’s treasury chief Alistair Darling said today that struggling bank Northern Rock PLC will be nationalized.
That after the government rejected two takeover bids.
Northern Rock ran into trouble in September because it relied too heavily on short-term money markets instead of deposits for funding.
http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/17022008/2/biz-finance-britain-nationalize-troubled-mortgage-lender-northern-rock.html
Filed under: In the News | Leave a comment »
View from the Titanic — in the news the week of 1-21-08
Chalmers Johnson, “How To Sink America”
http://www.rense.com/general80/sink.htm
_______________
Bill Engdahl, “The Financial Tsunami Part III: Greenspan’s Grand Design”
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/engdahl/2008/0123.html
______________
“Housing prices to free fall in 2008”
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/23/real_estate/merrill_forecast/index.htm?
______________
“A tipping point? ‘Foreclose me … I’ll save money’”
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/01/a-tipping-point.html
______________
George Soros, “The worst market crisis in 60 years”
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/24f73610-c91e-11dc-9807-000077b07658.html
_______________
Rick Ackerman, “PPT emerges from the shadows”
http://news.goldseek.com/RickAckerman/1201071660.php
Filed under: In the News | 2 Comments »
More banking woes: the lawsuits begin
CLEVELAND SUES 21 BANKS OVER SUBPRIME MESS
by Henry J. Gomez and Thomas Ott, January 11, 2008
Mayor Frank Jackson took aim at Wall Street on Thursday with a lawsuit against 21 major investment banks that he said have enabled the subprime lending and foreclosure crisis here.
The one-of-a-kind suit, filed in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, accuses venerable institutions such as Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Wells Fargo of creating a public nuisance.
Jackson contends the companies irresponsibly bought and sold high-interest home loans. The result: widespread defaults that depleted the city’s tax base and left entire neighborhoods in ruins.
. . . “To me, this is no different than organized crime or drugs,” Jackson said in an interview with Plain Dealer reporters and editors.
“It has the same effect as drug activity in neighborhoods. It’s a form of organized crime that happens to be legal in many respects.”
. . . Cleveland is the second major U.S. city this week to sue over the ills of subprime loans.
On Tuesday, Baltimore sued Wells Fargo, alleging the bank intentionally sold high-interest mortgages more to blacks than to whites – a violation of federal law.
The Baltimore and Cleveland efforts are believed to be the first attempts by large cities to recover losses blamed on the foreclosure epidemic, which has particularly plagued Ohio. . . .
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1200044068184570.xml&coll=2
Filed under: In the News | 4 Comments »
After the collapse – a short story
An entry below titled “Up to $6.5 trillion in mortgage-backed securities may be in jeopardy. Subprime borrowers may have an escape hatch — no paperwork providing standing to sue!”, got this response from short story writer Philip Zack:
The situation inspired me to write a short story called “As Is” about life after the collapse. It starts like this…
Ryan Svorlin stood in front of the big house, gaping. The keys hung loosely in his shaking hand, clattering against one another in rhythmic reflection of the waves of shock coursing through his troubled mind. “It… it’s… mine,” he stammered, unable to comprehend what had just happened.
“Well, sure,” the real estate lady told him. “You did sign the papers, didn’t you?”
He slowly turned to look at her. Paper-thin skin stretched across unnaturally prominent cheekbones. Overdone make-up. Probably over seventy, he guessed. “Of course. But I never expected to —.”
“To be selected? Well, someone had to be. They couldn’t afford to let these places go vacant, after all.”
Less than a year had passed since the first cannonade in the financial meltdown destroyed the façade of normalcy masquerading as prosperity in the United States. Some faceless blogger had instigated a mortgage strike, an incautious response to the revelation that the reason the government was so determined to protect the masses from being dispossessed in their forced insolvency was the dirtiest little secret at the heart of the country’s high-flying economy – that nobody really owned all those high-risk loans, and therefore the houses could not be foreclosed. No one could have predicted what happened next.
Read the whole thing here:
http://klurgsheld.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/short-story-as-is/
Filed under: Brainstorming | 16 Comments »
The “Real Bills” Doctrine: A Modern Application?
A blogger named Syzygy just wrote this comment to the entry called “Why Not Gold?” below. The query was about the “real bills” doctrine, but I’ll quote the whole thing, as it was nice! —
“Am one-third through your book now. Of the hundreds of non-fiction books I’ve read, yours easily deserves a place in the top ten. Astonishingly well done and important.
“As for this Fekete/Hultberg stuff, I don’t understand a word of it. Will you please post your understanding of it on your site?
“I confess I’m pretty skeptical of gold/silver standards; what’s to stop foreign creditors from simply sucking out all the specie? If the Saudis, Chinese, and Japanese could exchange their declining US dollars for gold and silver bullion, wouldn’t they do that in an instant?”
— Syzygy
Thanks Syzygy. I agree that gold would just be vacuumed out by dollar-holding foreigners. That’s exactly what happened before 1971, when Nixon finally closed the “gold window” to preserve what little gold was left at Fort Knox. Fekete and Hultberg propose fixing the gold system by supplementing gold with “Real Bills” as was done in the 19th century. (See Hultberg, “The Future of Gold as Money,” Gold-Eagle.com, February 1, 2005.) I’m currently doing a book revision (to be available hopefully in early January) that contains a brief discussion of the Real Bills Doctrine, which I’ll post it here:
The “Real Bills” Doctrine
If using gold as a currency is plagued with so many problems, why did it work reasonably well right up to World War I? Nelson Hultberg and Antal Fekete argue that gold was able to function as a currency because it was supplemented with a private money system called “real bills” – short-term bills of exchange that traded among merchants as if they were money. Real bills were invoices for goods and services that were passed from hand to hand until they came due, serving as a secondary form of money that was independent of the banks and allowed the money supply to expand without losing its value.8
The “real bills” doctrine was postulated by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations in 1776. It held that so long as money is issued only for assets of equal value, the money will maintain its value no matter how much is issued. If the issuer takes in $100 worth of silver and issues $100 worth of paper money in exchange, the money will hold its value since it can be cashed in for the silver. Likewise, if the issuer takes I.O.U.s for $100 worth of corn in the future and issues $100 worth of paper money in exchange, the money will hold its value, since the issuer can sell the corn in the market and get its money back. Or if the issuer takes a mortgage on a gambler’s house in exchange for issuing $100 and lending it to the gambler, the money will hold its value even if the gambler loses the money in the market, since the issuer can sell the house and get its money back.
Professor Fekete observes that the real bills system works to preserve monetary value only when there is gold to be collected at the end of the exchange, but other commodities would obviously work as well. One alternative that has been proposed is the “Kilowatt Card,” a privately-issued paper currency that can be traded as money or cashed in for units of electricity.10 The nineteenth century Greenbackers relied on the “real bills” doctrine when they contended that the money supply would retain its value if the government issued paper dollars in exchange for labor that produced an equivalent value in goods and services. The real bills doctrine was rejected by twentieth century economists in favor of the quantity theory of money, but it is actually the basis on which the Federal Reserve advances credit today: it takes mortgage-backed loans as collateral, then “monetizes” them by advancing an equivalent sum in accounting-entry dollars to the borrowing bank.9
——-
That was what I had written, but in response to Syzygy’s question, I too don’t understand how adding “real bills” would allow a modern-day gold standard to work any better than it did in the 19th century, when it precipitated periodic serious depressions. Why not just use the “real bills” and skip the gold? Roosevelt took the dollar off the gold standard domestically for the same reason Nixon took it off internationally: people were cashing in their dollars for gold, draining gold reserves and collapsing the supply of paper dollars, which in 1933 were backed by 40 percent gold reserves. That meant that whenever two paper dollars were cashed in for gold, three other paper dollars issued as loans had to be called in as well. If Roosevelt had let it go on, the money supply could eventually have collapsed completely.
What I like about the real bills doctrine, though, is that it defines the difference between money created out of nothing just to pay off loans to banks (the sort of loans being madly extended right now by central banks in an effort to bail out commercial banks) and Greenback-style money issued as receipts for real goods and services (as Lincoln and the Guernsey Islanders did it). The latter was “backed” by something; supply balanced demand, so no inflation resulted. The Fed/central bank version is HIGHLY inflationary, because it pumps ever more “demand” into the system without creating anything productive to balance it in the way of “supply.”
Filed under: Brainstorming | 9 Comments »
More evidence that the banking system is on the verge of collapse
Subprime is just the tip of the iceberg. The banks are concealing bad loans Enron style . . .
http://www.counterpunch.org/martens12072007.html
“ON THE CUSP OF A MAMMOTH FINANCIAL CRISIS. AT STAKE IS NOTHING LESS THAN THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF THE U.S. BANKING SYSTEM.”
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/09/IN5BTNJ2V.DTL
Filed under: In the News | 3 Comments »
Up to $6.5 trillion in mortgage-backed securities debt may be in jeopardy. Subprime borrowers may have an escape hatch — no paperwork providing standing to sue!
A federal judge in Ohio has ruled that a Deutsche Bank trust failed to show standing to foreclose on 14 mortgages held as mortgage-backed securities, since it hadn’t produced original assignments from the mortgagors. The problem is, original assignments may not actually exist. Signed hard copies are required to foreclose, and the original signed mortgages have been left in a file somewhere, while the mortgages have been slice and diced and rehypothecated until no single investor or pool can prove ownership. If the mortgage-backed securities holders don’t hold enforceable mortgage notes, who does? Arguably nobody! Think of the fallout if ALL these defaulted subprime mortgages can’t be foreclosed on. Outstanding securitized mortgage debt now comes to $6.5 trillion. Once borrowers catch on, they may not bother to pay their mortgages even if they can; there’s no one with standing to foreclose!
Gretchen Morgenson, “Foreclosures Hit a Snag for Lenders,” New York Times, November 15, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/15/business/15lend.html
Filed under: In the News | 18 Comments »
U.S. banking system headed for bankruptcy?
The SIV superfund bailout resembles the accounting fraud in Enron, and it’s liable to end just as badly for the banks . . . .
Jim Willie, “Deadly Dollar Confluence,” 11-8-07
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/willie/2007/1108.html
“The banking distress is nowhere near ended, steadily denied as almost fixed, yet every passing week it seems yet another new remedy bailout rescue package feature . . . . The recent Structured Investment Vehicle (SIV) superfund testifies to the breadth of rescues. This one smells to high heaven as an illicit balance sheet redemption, at inflated unrealistic prices to boot, for the specific benefit of connected insider Wall Street firms. The Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley forced admission of losses is not a mere accounting issue, without cash being involved. They are gigantic investment losses that the cute SIV device could not avoid in hitting the balance sheets. All eyes have turned to balance sheet accounting gimmicks, otherwise called fraud. The truth might be that losses are twice what are admitted, maybe worse. . . . The total will inexorably march to $2 trillion, and that figure might be conservative. Do not expect foreigners to pick up that tab. It will be financed by the US$ printing press, weighing down the US Dollar.”
See also Charles Hughes Smith, “Empire of Debt I: The Great Unraveling Begins,” November 5, 2007 —
http://www.oftwominds.com/blognov07/empire-debt1.html
Filed under: In the News | 2 Comments »
Latest articles
BEHIND THE DRUMS OF WAR WITH IRAN:
NUCLEAR WEAPONS OR COMPOUND INTEREST?
November 9, 2007
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/war-with-iran.php
Update – more economic sanctions on Iran –
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2208176,00.html
LETTER TO THE UNITED NATIONS:
HOW TO CUT SUSTAINABLE ENERGY COSTS IN HALF
November 5, 2007
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/energy-costs.php
Filed under: Ellen Brown Articles/Commentary | 4 Comments »
The Fed bails out SIVs with conjured money
Excellent article explaining the SIV crisis:
“SIV-Positive,” by Eric J. Fry, October 26, 2007
http://www.agorafinancial.com/afrude/
Fry writes:
Since almost all the investors who comprise the free market refuse to purchase ABCP [asset-backed commercial paper], the Federal Reserve has stepped into the breach. . . .
Could the Fed conjure up $1 trillion worth of AB financing between now and President’s Day, 2008? Maybe, but probably not without also conjuring up a dollar crisis, or a bond market crisis…or both at once. The only viable path toward recovery and normalcy requires a legitimate mark-to-market. But marking MBS and CDOs to real-world prices might clip tens of billions of dollars from bank balance sheets…and might kick a few dozen millionaire-bankers to the curb.
Unfortunately, because the millionaire-bankers still control the flow of information – and still hold meetings with the Treasury Secretary to concoct shell games – the “fantasy pricing” regime remains in effect.
Filed under: In the News | Leave a comment »
Why not gold?
I’ve received many comments on returning to gold as the national medium of exchange. Here’s my short answer on why I think it’s an insufficient solution:
A dollar lent at 10 percent interest compounded annually becomes 10 dollars in under 25 years. That means that if the money supply were 100 percent gold, and if bankers lent out 10 percent of it at 10 percent interest compounded annually, in 25 years the bankers would own all the gold. To avoid that, either the money supply has to be expandable — which means allowing fiat money — or the taking of interest has to be outlawed, as it was in the Middle Ages.
Filed under: In the News | 45 Comments »
The banking shell game: “spreading risk” turns to contagion
Here is an excellent article explaining how the derivatives scheme, which “spread the risk” in a way that was supposed to protect investors, has actually spread credit risk like a contagion, infecting everything it touches.
“Financial Shell Games” by Satyajit Das, New Delhi, September 16, 2007
http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage_c.php?leftnm=10&autono=298108
Filed under: In the News | Leave a comment »
Smoke and mirrors: concealing economic collapse with the shock of war?
“Soup Kitchen USA” by Mike Whitney, September 11, 2007http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18360.htm
“It’s all smoke and mirrors. The financial system has decoupled from the productive elements of the economy and is now beginning to show disturbing signs of instability. That’s why the big blow-off in the bond market. The halcyon days of supplying our armies, funding our markets and building our subprime ‘ownership society’ empire on the backs of foreign creditors is over. The stock market is headed for the landfill and housing is leading the way. Economic fundamentals can only be ignored for so long . . . .”
At the end of this article,Whitney discusses one from the UK Telegraph (9-9-07) titled “Banks Face 10-day Debt Time Bomb”:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/09/09/cndebt109.xml
To which one blogger ominously observes:
In the article above, it notes that UK banks are in serious trouble of having to cough up a boatload of cash between 9/11 and 9/19. 9/14 lies smack in the middle of this. Could another false flag attack be used as some type of distraction? Most of the SEC evidence against World Com, Enron and others was lost in the WTC complex on 9/11/01. Is there a target in America that will serve the same purpose this time around? It seems the global financial system is in the process of imploding. We need to quickly identify how an attack might thwart it, or maybe make it look like it was the attack rather than bad monetary and fiscal policy that caused the economy to tank world wide. Would this just be an attack, an ‘accident’ or the sum of all fears – an errant nuke detonation used to justify a limited and orchestrated nuclear exchange between West and East? If the global monetary system is about to result in open worldwide revolution, and you were responsible, wouldn’t you try to make it look like something else was the cause? (and take out a few of the ‘masses’ in the process?) Remember, most military action in any nation is the direct result of flawed domestic policy or weak leaders, most notably relating to the economy. Now imagine that on a world wide scale.
http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=48646&fb=1
See also “The Shock Doctrine,” a must-see film by Alfonso Cuarón and Naomi Klein, demonstrating how “free market” economists pioneered the concept of “shock” to push through whatever draconion economic policies they desired on unsuspecting populations recovering from major disasters:
http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine/short-film
Filed under: In the News | Leave a comment »




Works of art are never finished . . .
March 2, 2008 at 5:06 pm Ellen: I’m still reading the first edition of your book (and I am so grateful for the clarity of it all; what a welcome education). Are you able to quickly summarize what topics are in the new version that are not in the original? Any hint on the topic of your new book? Many thanks for all this work…what a service.
Filed under: Ellen Brown Articles/Commentary | 7 Comments »